It
were not quite preces for "the it honey order" This had "Some I. Koney ordu", me point bune
xt tientations of the that if then is to
t
principle Court down in sec 15 it meant proceed from the It. Kone side of it proceeds from
the harperial Act contemplated by suc 15
any the
4
that
Act
as the Tunneyou pay, pro
Fanto
1
1
overrides she 15 and the words "umber....
N°
66.
Sir.
appear" are
surple-age
jog2.
As a
result
of
Ssc 15, if an lunperial Act
of sag, 1880 is
reformed to in a H.Korde
andes refreated by a replaced by
an Act of,
say, 1915, the latter Act will to impostit!
and if this is for
into the It K orde
me read undesirable It.h will hav to press an order declaring that the reference continues to is to the older
'Act & not to the later on
provided by the 15.
Such cases
howwows, will probable, to rass and
I think we may
" Ploceed
proposed
An
Al
22
J.J.R.
2013
the lates
wine or pas
enlaborati
RECO
CO
8191
REOF 18 MAR 12
333
GOVERNMENT HOUSE,
HONGKONG. 22nd. February, 1912.
In continuation of my Despatch No. 39 of the
25th. of January and in further reply to your Despatch No. 373 of
the 21st. of last December, I have the honour to transmit copies of
a minute and of a memorandum by His Honour the Chief Justice.
I have the honour to be,
Sir,
Your most obedient,
humble servant,
Ringan
Governor,&c..
RIGHT HONOURABLE
LEWIS HARCOURT, M.P.,
&C..
&C..
&c...
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.